RECORD CRACK: Master tape of The Beatles’ “Sgt. Pepper” sold for 2.8K on eBay

An article at Ultimate Classic Rock revealed that a master tape for The Beatles‘ 1967 album, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band (which will celebrate its 45th anniversary in 12 days), was sold on eBay for $2,800 U.S. Even after reading the article, I wanted to investigate this a bit further.

Photobucket
Photobucket
Photobucket

There are many different versions of what is called a “master tape”, so for those who might be curious about its authenticity, I shall explain some of the technical information that I know.

In the days of analog tape, when an artist is in post-production and mixes an album for release, it is mixed towards a final “master tape”. It is this “master tape” that becomes the source for a domestic pressing (i.e. the label in the home country of the artist) and all pressings around the world. However, the story doesn’t end there. When a “master tape” is made, that was generally preserved by the record company, a/k/a “the owners” of the intellectual property of the music. From this master tape, a small number of “safety copies” or “safety masters” were produced. In some instances, it is this “safety master” that is sent to various record affiliates around the world. Once again, the story doesn’t quite end there either. Sometimes, the “safety master” became the source to press up tapes that would be sent to label affiliates around the world. Basically, you have a bit of sound degradation with each copy, so by the time a record is pressed in a specific country, you’re hearing a 3rd or 4th generation tape of the original master tape. To add to this, some label affiliates would make a safety copy of their safety copy, or “a dub of a dub”, and keep that in the library for further use. When records are produced, a “mother” plate is created which is used as the source to press up records at the pressing plant. All “mothers” have a shelf life and can wear out with each record pressing, and with the nature of pressing plants, they could easily break. If one is worn out or breaks/cracks, another “mother” has to be made from the master tape they have available. This is why some collectors prefer to buy/have/fine the very first pressing of any specific record, because it usually means the sound is as best it can be. In some circles, this is called a “hot stamper”, which means you are getting some of the very first pressings from the original mother stamping plate, and a few collectors will pay premium. It has been the subject of debate.

One more aspect. In the early 1960’s, when Beatles masters were sent to Capitol Records in the U.S. from Parlophone in the UK, some songs meant for release as 45rpm records were treated/drenched in reverb. This was done by Dave Dexter Jr., a A&R man and producer at Capitol who was in charge of what was and wasn’t released on his label. After initially rejecting the Beatles, the phenomenon was slowly growing into something, and with a number of smaller independent labels having a bit of success with Beatles singles, along with major persuasion from EMI in the UK, Dexter and Capitol were moved to sign them. When he received Beatles songs for release as singles, he would treat them with reverb at Capitol’s mastering studio. It was discovered that the U.S. pressings of these singles sounded quite different from the clean (some would say puritanical) mixes that were on the British pressings of the same songs. Years later, when someone confronted members of the group about these pressings, one of them (I think it was Paul McCartney) said he preferred the U.S. pressings over the British ones, because that American style of production is what they had always wanted to achieve, but never could. Beatles fans have come to love to hate these “Dexter-ized” pressings, but are still sought after by fans and collectors.

I mention this because with Sgt. Pepper, it was a project that The Beatles wanted untouched from start to finish. It was a common practice for Capitol Records to chop up the sequence of British albums and release a few songs as singles and EP’s, of which there is no British counterpart. With Sgt. Pepper, the group made sure that every aspect of the album was as they wanted it from start to finish, including how the public heard it.


What you see in the above photos are a look at a master reel tape and technical information, but with anything Beatles-related, one can ask “is this authentic? How can anyone just obtain a master tape?” In this case, this is a master tape made by Capitol Records in the U.S. for Capitol of Mexico. This means that when Capitol U.S. received their Sgt. Pepper master from Parlophone, they created a tape dub to be sent to the Mexican affiliate. This technically means that sonically, the Mexican pressing is one or two generations down from the American one. I am not sure if Capitol U.S. also made safety masters for Canada or other countries within the Americas (if anyone knows, feel free to reply).

The master tape shown is the mono mix. The top shows the catalog number for the stereo Mexican pressing, which was SLEM-081. LEM-081 is typewritten on the page, and there’s also indication (with a checked box) that this is the mono mix. The sheet tells the pressing plant what the tape is for, so the sheet indicates that the tape is for a 12″ record at 33 1/3 rpm, and to be pressed with a Capitol label. Capitol had a number of subsidiary labels, and on this sheet, there are unchecked boxes for Angel, Seraphim (both Capitol’s classical divisions), Odeon, and Pickwick.
Photobucket

The information also shows how much silence is meant to be heard between each track. For Sgt. Pepper, a number of songs segue into one another without interruption, while others have less than a second of silence before the next song begins. It was normal for albums to have 2 to 4 seconds of silence between tracks. For this album, the length of each break (or lack of them) were intentional and for the most part. The master tapes would have the silence physically attached on the physical tape with “leader tape”, but there was also a command from Parlophone to leave the album “as is”. Mastering engineers around the world could sequence/master the album as they deemed fit, including changing the amount of space between songs. Mastering engineers could also change the dynamics of the album without telling anyone, but also had to deal with the technology and upkeep of their respective pressing plants. All of these technicalities were eliminated with compact disc and more specifically, when every label affiliate around the world would receive the exact digital master from the same source. But in this case, the information on the box shows how much silence is used in between songs that have them, and how some do not. One section of the box reveals that this master was prepared by Capitol Records U.S. for Capitol of Mexico on 5/2/67 (May 2, 1967), or a month before the official release of the album.
Photobucket

What I could not find in these photos was an indication to include the “dog whistle” and “secret ending” at the end of Side 2, what is commonly known as the “Sgt. Pepper Inner Groove”. This surprise could be found on every world pressing of the album except the U.S. version. I do see some handwritten notes on these boxes, but nothing that might suggest “there is audio at the end of the tape that will be used for Side 2” or instructions to keep that audio on the record as it moves towards the center of the record.

After all of this technical information, this master tape would be the source of what you hear on this pressing:

Photobucket

When it comes to anything Beatles-related, if it was indeed the actual master tape The Beatles and producer Sir George Martin created, this auction would have been pulled/stopped immediately. Nonetheless, it is a rare occurrence that even a safety copy or a master tape dub, especially one with “Beatles status”, surfaces in a casual manner. This is very much an authentic tape. Collectors will buy them with no intention of playing it or finding a tape machine to hear it, for it is a piece of Beatles and music history that is worth preserving, even if as a “museum piece”. Not sure what the buyer plans on doing with it, but it’s interesting to know it exists.

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=000000&IS2=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=thisbosmu-20&o=1&p=8&l=as4&m=amazon&f=ifr&ref=ss_til&asins=B0025KVLTMhttp://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=000000&IS2=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=thisbosmu-20&o=1&p=8&l=as4&m=amazon&f=ifr&ref=ss_til&asins=B0000009RXhttp://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=000000&IS2=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=thisbosmu-20&o=1&p=8&l=as4&m=amazon&f=ifr&ref=ss_til&asins=B000W25MFO
http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=000000&IS2=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=thisbosmu-20&o=1&p=8&l=as4&m=amazon&f=ifr&ref=ss_til&asins=B005EQTJ4Shttp://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=000000&IS2=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=thisbosmu-20&o=1&p=8&l=as4&m=amazon&f=ifr&ref=ss_til&asins=B000R009OAhttp://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=000000&IS2=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=thisbosmu-20&o=1&p=8&l=as4&m=amazon&f=ifr&ref=ss_til&asins=B004K9307M

0 thoughts on “RECORD CRACK: Master tape of The Beatles’ “Sgt. Pepper” sold for 2.8K on eBay

  1. I have a 1967 reel to reel Beatles, Sgt.Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band from Capital….any idea of the value?

    I also have a Jim Hendrix Master Duplication reel to reel “Bold as Love” The Jimi Hendrix Experience. Any idea as to the value or who might want to buy these?

    Like

  2. Evelyn: thanks for replying. With the SGT. PEPPER reel, it depends on the condition. A quick look on eBay shows copies going from $10 to $25.

    As for the Hendrix reel, one went for $105 on eBay but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s worth that much to everyone. I would say expect the same amount: $10 to $25 depending on condition, because condition of the box, the reel, and the tape itself is key.

    If they were actually master tapes created or for the record company, as discussed in this article, it would be a lot more but the ones you have were made for the customer and would often have a lot of wear and tear due to the nature of the tape and how they may have been stored. With that said, you still could get up to $25, if not more, if the condition is quite good, as collectors want to not only see and have it in their collections, but possibly play it too.

    Like

  3. My father (Hugh Davies) was the recording engineer at the Beatles at the Hollywood Bowl. He made a stereophonic safety copy (3m Scotch recording tape) of the recording and I was wondering what this might be worth.

    Best regards,

    Sherwood Davies

    Like

    • First off, thank you for replying. The stereophonic safety copy would depend on what the copy is of. If it’s the same mix that was released as the live album in 1977, probably not too much. If the mix is somehow different from the released version, it might be worth something. I know there was an initial mix planned for the 1964 show, but that was initially scrapped because George Martin wasn’t satisfied with it. That master had been bootlegged for years. The Beatles played the Hollywood Bowl three times: once in 1964 and twice in 1965.

      If it’s stereophonic, then that would mean that the safety copy comes from a mix specifically made for something. Was it a stereophonic made for 1964 use, or towards the 1977 live album? Value would depend on what the source is, and of course condition. Considering how close your father was to the source, it might be of value to someone, especially if it’s something that was not used, even if it is a safety copy.

      Like

  4. Your Hendrix master dub, if it is 15ips 2 track safety master copy, will go for a hell of a lot more than 10 or 20 bucks. And any Beatles factory reel to reel will also go for a LOT more than 10-20 bucks.
    Is this article from the 80’s or something?
    Safety master dupes go for hundreds and sometimes thousands of dollars. The last Beatles safety master COPY (2nd gen.) I saw on eBay ended up going for $2700. It was a 15ips dub of Rubber Soul.
    I pay $150 per reel for master dubs. To listen to. On a tape machine.

    Like

  5. Harv, prices are debatable and also it’s an issue of quality. A comment like yours will make people believe that a Beatles reel of any quality can go for much more. That is not true. Some, but not *any*.

    That of course is a different issue from actual safety masters.

    Like

  6. Getting back to the original subject, the gentleman in Mexico that is the source of the “Mexican Beatles Master Tapes” recovered several hundred analog master tapes after Thorn bought EMI in 1979 and fired most of the Capitol Mexico employees, including him. At that time they threw out the analog tapes, which he then recovered from the dumpster. I have several photos of the room in his house where there are stacks and stacks, hundreds, of Discos Capitol de Mexico tape boxes with their artist, title and LEM and SLEM number system on the spine (mostly not the Beatles). This dumpster story is not as far fetched as it sounds as there have been other purges/dumpster dives at Bell (or was it Sterling) in NY, Jugatron in Yugoslovia and Odeon in Venezuela and Spain. Once the switch to CDs were made, the analog sources were superfluous.

    Look at the MFSL LP covers; the photos of the tape boxes show 20 or 30 copies of the master of each Beatles album were made for EMI affiliates and sent around the world. That’s hundreds of Beatles Master tapes out in the world. That some were stolen or disposed of is likely.So I think its quite plausible that a number of 1st or 2nd generation tapes are likely in circulation.

    I’ve purchased several of these “Mexican Master Tapes” and the quality ranges from fair to pristine. This is why: Its true, as you’ve said in the post above, that Capitol US provided the tapes to Capitol Mexico during the sixties and that they are likely Nth generation. In fact one tape that I from Capitol US via Mexico has numerous deteriorating splices at random locations because the tape had been assembled from scrapes – such was the low regard the LA Capitol folks had for their Mexican affiliate. However most the the tapes that the Mexican gentleman had were from master copies made in the seventies that came directly from EMI. The 70s Mexican masters have the standard EMI sticker with engineers notes and sound fantastic, much better than MFSL, Japanese Red or any of the recent LP remasters; there are a lot of little things that are audible on the masters that are not on any other source I’ve had access to.

    One other thought, the 1st gen vs. second gen. quality difference argument is somewhat BS given that the master itself is a copy of the original recording, copied for the remix, and many of the songs had been bounced, some several times, during recording. So the “master” of some songs are already essentially 2nd, 3rd, 4th gen in some cases. The MFSL Magical Mystery Tour LP doesn’t sound particularly degraded relative to the other MFSL LPs, yet it was made from the US Capitol Master, itself a compilation of EMI-provided copies of the master. So its 2nd generation at best. Listening to theMexcian-sourced, 70s EMI-provided master tape of the album “Abbey Road” the sound quality is the best I’ve heard, yet the quality of each individual song seems to be determined more by how many bounce-downs occurred during recording (at least once for “Something” – and it sounds not as clear) compared to songs that were recorded without bouncing down (like “Come Together”, “Here Comes the Sun”) that sound amazing.

    Whether the 70s Mexican masters tapes are first gen dubs of the original master or dubbed from an Abbey Road safety copy, they seem to be early generations. The sixties masters made by Capitol US are not as good. One other point. EMI-Abbey Road engineers switched from using exclusively EMITAPE in the sixties to, in the 70s, using Scotch tape (first 206,207 and then 226,227 and finally 250). Then onto Ampex 373, then 406 and 454 (the later often show bad SSS) also occasionally AFGA and BASF. However they did not pay attention to keeping the tape type, tape reel and tape boxes together, so I often see, for example, Scotch 207 tape on an Ampex reel in an AFGA box.

    Sorry for the long post. That’s my $0.02.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s